I’m writing a paper for my business ethics class. It has to be 4-5 pages long and about an ethical decision I know of personally or something I read in the paper. I decided to write about Martha Stewart and her insider trading conviction. I finished the paper in about 1 page. So, I started digging deeper to get more information and make my paper more interesting. There are two things I’ve discovered about myself from this paper.
One! I’m not so sure I believe what Martha did was unethical. Was it wrong and did she break laws? Sure! But, did you know she only gained $51,000 from selling her stocks early? That’s pocket change for a billionaire like her! She gives that out as Christmas presents each year (I’m assuming). The company who she owned the shares of stocks in is a pharmaceutical company who primarily does research on cancer drugs. Martha’s early payout didn’t bankrupt that company and didn’t ruin people’s retirement dreams the way Enron did. I also think Martha is super smart and I don’t believe she did anything sneaky. And, maybe I’m saying that because I get details to things going on in my company all the time and it’s never a big deal until someone makes it a big deal.
Two! Why can’t I write papers like I write in my blog?! I can sum up the facts about an event so well but teachers put these requirements that papers have to be a certain length. Why? Who says? You will know what I’m talking about in a 2-page paper. Oh well.
I’m determined to improve my writing skills with the blog and with that have something to write in the blog from my school experiences.
The art of writing is the art of discovering what you believe. — Gustave Flaubert


